A Selection of IBC Research Abstracts Published in 2018
What is an abstract?
“An abstract of an article is a summary of the paper….If there is an introduction, it describes the background leading up to the research, and often mentions other similar studies. If well written, the introduction will bring readers up to speed on the field and leave them with an understanding of why the authors decided to do the experiments they are presenting.” [from the American Association for Cancer Research]
How can I read the complete research article?
If free full text is available, it will be mentioned, and a link provided in the title. If free full text is not available, copy the citation and check with a reference librarian at your local public library for assistance in obtaining a copy of the full article. The library may charge a fee or may be able to get the article at no charge.
Jacene HA., et al. (2018) Metabolic Characterization of Inflammatory Breast Cancer With Baseline FDG-PET/CT: Relationship With Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Receptor Status, and Tumor Grade. Clinical Breast Cancer. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.11.010. Free full text is not available.
The aim of this study was to determine if, in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), baseline metabolic activity (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax]) of primary tumor and involved regional lymph nodes (IRLN) are prognostic markers of response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAS).
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Baseline 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans were retrospectively reviewed among 61 women with IBC who received NAS, had mastectomy, and had available pathology reports. Primary tumor and IRLN SUVmax were compared between patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) versus those with residual disease after NAS. A multivariate Cox model was fit to evaluate the effects of SUVmax on overall survival, adjusting for pCR and stratified by receptor status and disease stage.
SUVmax in primary IBC tumors tended to increase with tumor grade (trend test P = .06) and was lower for stage III, non-triple-negative (TN) versus stage III, TN and stage IV, non-TN disease (P = .04). Neither primary tumor nor IRLN SUVmax was significantly different comparing pCR versus residual disease after NAS. Adjusting for pathology response in the overall survival model stratified by stage and receptor status, baseline SUVmax in primary IBC tumor was associated with an estimated hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.25; P = .15) for patients with stage III, TN and stage IV, non-TN disease. This hazard ratio corresponded to a 1.74-fold risk of death with 1 standard deviation (SD = 5.9) increase in baseline SUVmax in primary IBC tumor.
2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography provides prognostic information for newly diagnosed IBC. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and assess how such early information could affect treatment choices for IBC in the neoadjuvant setting.
Gudina, AT., et al. (2018) Racial/ethnic disparities in inflammatory breast cancer survival in the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5037-y.
Free full text is not available.
While racial disparities in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) incidence are fairly well documented, with black women having significantly higher rates compared to white women; less is known about whether IBC prognosis differs by race/ethnicity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess racial/ethnic disparities in survival among women diagnosed with IBC in the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program (MCSP) from 1998 to 2014.
We examined the frequency and percentage of breast cancer cases coded to the various IBC codes in the MCSP registry over the study period. We used age-adjusted and multivariable Cox Proportional hazard regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of race/ethnicity with all-cause mortality.
Using a comprehensive case definition of IBC, 1324 IBC patients were identified from women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the MCSP [Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) = 227; Non-Hispanic White (NHW) = 984; Hispanic = 86; other = 27]. The percentage of all breast cancer cases defined as IBC in the MCSP registry differs considerably across registry codes from 0.02 to 1.1%. We observed significantly higher risk of death among NHB compared with NHW [HR (95% CI), 1.21 (1.01-1.45)], while no significant survival differences were observed between NHW and Hispanics or other racial/ethnic minorities.
A comprehensive case definition should be utilized to avoid underestimation of IBC and to better understand this aggressive disease. Further research is needed to identify underlying causes and develop effective interventions to reduce IBC survival disparities between NHB and NHW women.
Çakar B, et al. (2018) The Impact of Subtype Distribution in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Outcome. European Journal of Breast Health, 14(4), 211-217. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.4170. Free full text is available at link in title.
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has an unfavourable prognosis despite the advances made in the treatment of breast cancer. Our study aimed to define immunohistochemistry-based surrogate subtype distribution to determine whether the breast cancer subtype accompanied survival outcome differences in IBC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Medical records of female breast cancer patients with non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer admitted to our clinic between March 2000 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical and pathological feature of the primary tumour, adjuvant treatment options and survival data were analysed. Intrinsic breast cancer subtypes were defined according to ER, PR, HER-2 and ki-67 status.
We identified 129 non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients. Median follow-up was 73 months. 10 (7.7%) were luminal A-like, 67 (51.9%) were luminal B-like, 37 (28.6%) were HER-2 positive, and 15 (11.6%) were triple negative (TNBC) by immunohistochemistry. There were no statistically significant differences between subtypes in terms of histological type, grade, tumour size and lymph node status. Median disease-free survival was 47 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.2-82.6) and median overall survival was 75 months (95% CI 64.7-90.8). Triple negative breast cancer showed poorer outcome than other subgroups. Presence of TNBC disease was associated with poorer outcome compared to luminal A (HR: 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.92, p: 0.039), luminal B (HR: 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.74, p: 0.007) and HER-2 positive subgroups (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.94, p:0.037). Luminal A patients had a trend to have a better overall survival which did not reach to a statistical significant difference.
Our study put forth that IBC have a poor prognosis irrespective of breast cancer surrogate subtype distribution. Luminal A, the most frequent subtype of breast cancer was the least common in our IBC patient group. TNBC had the worst outcome when compared to other breast cancer subtypes.
Romanoff, A., et al. (2018) Does nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer have a worse prognosis than other nonmetastatic T4 cancers? Cancer, 124(22) 4314-4321. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31757. Free full text is not available.
Both patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IFLBC) and patients with noninflammatory T4 breast cancer (non-IFLBC) have a heavy disease burden in the breast; whether the unique biology of IFLBC conveys a higher locoregional recurrence (LRR) risk and worse outcomes in comparison with other T4 lesions is uncertain. Here the outcomes of patients with IFLBC and patients with non-IFLBC treated with modern multimodality therapy are compared.
Patients with nonmetastatic T4 breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy, and radiation therapy between 2006 and 2016 were identified. Recurrences and survival were compared between patients with IFLBC and patients with non-IFLBC overall and stratified by receptor subtype.
For 199 T4 patients, the median age was 52 years, and the median clinical tumor size was 7 cm. One hundred seventeen (59%) had IFLBC. With a median follow-up of 41 months, 4 patients had isolated LRR; all cases occurred in patients with IFLBC. The 5-year isolated LRR rate for patients with IFLBC was 4.8%. Overall, 14 patients had both LRR and distant recurrence (DR); 47 had DR only. The 5-year distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) rates were similar for patients with IFLBC and patients with non-IFLBC (63% vs 71%; log-rank P = .14). The 5-year DRFS rate was lowest among triple-negative (TN) patients (43%) and was significantly lower for patients with TN IFLBC versus patients with non-IFLBC (28% vs 62%; log-rank P = .02). The 5-year overall survival rates (71% vs 74%; log-rank P = .4) and cancer-specific survival rates (74% vs 79%; log-rank P = .23) did not differ between IFLBC and non-IFLBC.
Although IFLBC is often considered a unique biologic subtype, patients with IFLBC and patients with non-IFLBC had similar outcomes with modern multimodality therapy; isolated LRR was uncommon. The TN subtype in patients with IFLBC is associated with poor outcomes, and this indicates the need for new treatment approaches in this group.
Fouad, TM., et al. (2018) Distinct epidemiological profiles associated with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): A comprehensive analysis of the IBC registry at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 24;13(9):e0204372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204372. Free full text is available at link in title.
To date, studies on inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) lack comprehensive epidemiological data. We analyzed detailed prospectively collected clinical and epidemiological data from the IBC Registry at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Patients with IBC (n = 248) were consecutively diagnosed and prospectively enrolled between November 2006 and April 2013. All patients were newly diagnosed and at least 18 years old. Secondary IBC was excluded. Overall 160 variables were collected and evaluated including sociodemographics, anthropometrics, tobacco and alcohol consumption, reproductive variables, and family history data.
Mean age at diagnosis was 51.6 (±11.5 SD) years, and the majority of patients were White (77.8%). A mean BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, irrespective of menopausal status, was observed in 80.2% of all patients, with 82.6% of African Americans being obese. Approximately 42.2% of patients were ever smokers, and 91% reported ever being pregnant. A history of breastfeeding was reported in 54% of patients, with significant differences between ethnic groups in favor of White women (P<0.0001). Other reproductive factors such as use of birth control pills & hormone replacement therapy were also more frequently associated with White women compare to other ethnic groups (P < 0.05). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, African American or Hispanic ethnicity, not having breastfed, higher clinical stage, and TNBC subtype were associated with shorter survival.
Our data suggest that IBC is associated with distinct epidemiological profiles. This information could assist in targeting patients with specific preventive strategies based on their modifiable behavioral patterns.
Gutierrez Barrera AM., et al. (2018) BRCA mutations in women with inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer. 2018 Feb 1;124(3):466-474. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31069. Free full text is not available.
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) often affects women at a relatively young age. To the authors’ knowledge, the rate of BRCA variants among patients with IBC is not known. To determine the association between BRCA status and IBC, the authors evaluated its rate and compared the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with IBC with those of patients with other breast cancers (non-IBC).
Patients who presented at the study institution’s cancer genetics program and who underwent BRCA genetic testing were included in the current study. The authors compared clinicopathologic data between patients with IBC and those with non-IBC using propensity score matching to identify predictors.
A total of 1789 patients who underwent BRCA genetic testing (1684 with non-IBC and 105 with IBC) were included. BRCA pathogenic variants were found in 27.3% of patients with non-IBC and 18.1% of patients with IBC (P = .0384). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences noted between patients with IBC and those with non-IBC, including the rate of BRCA pathogenic variants (P = .5485). However, a subgroup analysis of the 479 patients with BRCA pathogenic variants demonstrated that patients with IBC (19 patients) were diagnosed at significantly younger ages compared with patients with non-IBC (P = .0244).
There was no clear association observed between BRCA pathogenic variants and IBC. However, among patients who tested positive for BRCA pathogenic variants, those with IBC were younger at the time of diagnosis compared with those with non-IBC breast cancers. These results confirm that genetic testing is important for patients with IBC who meet the current clinical criteria for genetic testing in breast cancer
Mamouch, F., et al. (2018) Inflammatory Breast Cancer: A Literature Review. World Journal of Oncology, 2018 Nov;9(5-6):129-135. doi: 10.14740/wjon1161. Free full text is available at link in title.
The multidisciplinary management of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), which is the most aggressive form of breast cancer due to its rapid proliferation, has changed over the past three decades thanks to advances in medical treatments that represent the basis of treatment, without eliminating the use of locoregional treatments including surgery and radiotherapy in the localized stages. The molecular profile determination of IBC allows the orientation towards new targeted therapeutic strategies with an impact on survival.